Cost of Living and Quality Of Life Overlap Analysis

This comparison highlights how affordability and everyday quality of life overlap across major cities. It shows where expenses are manageable, where purchasing power is stronger, and where lifestyle factors such as safety, health care, and commute time may offset higher costs.

Cost of Living Table
Rank
City
Cost of Living Index
Rent Index
Cost of Living Plus Rent Index
Groceries Index
Restaurant Price Index
Local Purchasing Power Index
1 Zurich, Switzerland 123.1 74.5 100.9 125.0 121.7 152.0
2 George Town, Cayman Islands 116.5 77.1 98.5 129.8 100.7 144.8
3 Lucerne, Switzerland 112.7 48.6 83.4 106.5 123.0 152.1
4 Basel, Switzerland 111.9 48.0 82.7 108.5 110.6 161.3
5 Geneva, Switzerland 111.3 64.3 89.8 107.3 114.5 151.2
6 Lugano, Switzerland 110.4 43.4 79.8 107.3 130.7 160.3
7 St. Gallen, Switzerland 108.7 41.1 77.8 104.2 113.5 164.7
8 Lausanne, Switzerland 108.7 53.2 83.3 107.5 109.2 145.0
9 Bern, Switzerland 108.7 44.5 79.4 105.7 108.3 168.4
10 Honolulu, HI, United States 105.4 63.9 86.4 128.3 107.8 87.4
11 Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel 103.9 49.4 79.0 95.0 107.3 100.8
12 New York, NY, United States 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
13 Reykjavik, Iceland 98.3 48.7 75.6 107.6 104.1 109.3
14 San Francisco, CA, United States 94.9 81.4 88.7 102.7 94.3 156.9
15 Washington, DC, United States 92.1 68.2 81.2 95.6 93.3 156.4
16 Oslo, Norway 92.1 39.1 67.9 93.1 96.6 112.1
17 Jerusalem, Israel 91.7 42.2 69.1 91.2 88.9 107.8
18 Seattle, WA, United States 91.4 59.8 76.9 100.9 89.3 156.2
19 Singapore, Singapore 90.8 68.3 80.5 84.9 54.4 91.3
20 Saint Helier, Jersey 89.8 45.4 69.5 82.0 102.9 125.2
21 Bergen, Norway 89.6 28.2 61.5 91.7 99.7 129.4
22 Haifa, Israel 89.1 23.1 58.9 82.8 106.5 140.1
23 Boston, MA, United States 89.0 77.0 83.5 93.8 92.2 134.7
24 London, United Kingdom 88.0 66.9 78.3 72.4 87.0 98.3
25 San Jose, CA, United States 87.7 69.8 79.5 91.1 85.7 139.8
26 Stavanger, Norway 87.5 35.2 63.6 92.7 90.8 142.1
27 Anchorage, AK, United States 87.4 37.5 64.6 91.8 84.0 134.6
28 Trondheim, Norway 87.0 29.1 60.5 91.6 91.4 126.1
29 Copenhagen, Denmark 86.8 44.6 67.5 82.0 95.4 127.7
30 Oakland, CA, United States 85.2 58.2 72.9 97.7 90.0 131.9
31 Miami, FL, United States 85.1 67.5 77.1 89.2 99.2 100.3
32 Los Angeles, CA, United States 84.5 65.7 75.9 86.8 91.0 107.4
33 San Diego, CA, United States 83.7 73.8 79.2 85.8 89.0 119.4
34 Portland, OR, United States 83.6 46.6 66.7 97.0 80.8 139.3
35 Amsterdam, Netherlands 81.4 54.5 69.1 74.2 85.8 119.9
36 Philadelphia, PA, United States 81.3 44.8 64.6 88.6 74.8 125.8
37 Arlington, VA, United States 80.8 61.3 71.9 92.1 84.2 168.0
38 Jersey City, NJ, United States 80.7 68.9 75.3 83.7 82.8 151.3
39 Luxembourg, Luxembourg 80.6 52.1 67.6 76.9 90.4 136.9
40 Irvine, CA, United States 80.5 67.7 74.7 86.5 84.7 158.5
41 Aarhus, Denmark 80.5 30.1 57.5 74.5 94.5 142.4
42 Winston-Salem, NC, United States 80.3 33.0 58.7 106.3 75.2 112.4
43 Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States 79.8 60.4 70.9 87.9 87.5 117.4
44 Aalborg, Denmark 79.7 21.3 53.0 78.3 88.5 154.7
45 Sydney, Australia 79.2 56.0 68.6 87.6 68.6 105.9
46 Stockholm, Sweden 79.1 37.0 59.8 76.4 78.6 111.4
47 Sacramento, CA, United States 79.0 44.8 63.4 87.6 74.3 132.7
48 Denver, CO, United States 78.5 45.3 63.3 89.0 76.9 129.9
49 Paris, France 78.4 40.4 61.0 79.2 72.5 109.8
Quality of Life Table
Rank
City
Quality of Life Index
Purchasing Power Index
Safety Index
Health Care Index
Cost of Living Index
Property Price to Income Ratio
Traffic Commute Time Index
1 The Hague (Den Haag), Netherlands 221.5 137.0 78.9 82.7 74.9 6.5 20.2
2 Eindhoven, Netherlands 210.7 131.9 77.8 76.5 71.1 7.3 23.5
3 Rotterdam, Netherlands 205.5 124.6 70.0 79.2 77.2 6.1 21.3
4 Utrecht, Netherlands 204.9 134.4 73.5 78.6 76.3 7.5 23.7
5 Gent, Belgium 203.7 135.3 75.2 80.2 71.7 6.1 25.2
6 Stuttgart, Germany 203.5 156.1 66.0 77.1 70.3 7.0 25.0
7 Groningen, Netherlands 203.1 113.2 76.1 72.9 71.3 7.6 19.2
8 Luxembourg, Luxembourg 201.6 140.8 71.5 72.4 80.8 10.6 27.8
9 Nuremberg, Germany 201.0 149.8 66.6 67.1 67.8 7.3 25.3
10 Gothenburg, Sweden 199.5 147.7 54.2 69.4 64.6 6.8 24.3
11 Stavanger, Norway 198.0 144.4 71.5 70.2 87.6 5.6 39.1
12 Copenhagen, Denmark 197.2 130.6 73.7 75.2 87.1 10.7 27.5
13 Amsterdam, Netherlands 196.4 123.5 70.0 75.4 81.6 9.9 22.8
14 Dusseldorf, Germany 196.2 136.5 65.9 73.4 71.9 9.7 26.9
15 Bergen, Norway 195.9 130.9 74.9 72.7 89.6 7.0 32.0
16 Vienna, Austria 195.7 116.1 70.6 79.9 74.7 15.8 22.9
17 Munich, Germany 195.7 129.7 78.3 77.0 77.6 13.1 28.2
18 Frankfurt, Germany 195.4 142.3 54.5 76.4 71.7 7.7 22.8
19 Helsinki, Finland 195.1 109.8 74.9 80.1 74.1 11.4 24.1
20 Reykjavik, Iceland 194.8 111.7 75.4 69.6 98.6 7.8 20.5
21 Trondheim, Norway 194.7 127.8 78.1 75.8 87.1 6.6 32.6
22 Geneva, Switzerland 194.3 155.1 70.5 69.3 111.5 13.1 32.6
23 Liverpool, United Kingdom 193.8 128.1 52.7 79.1 67.4 4.9 27.8
24 Zurich, Switzerland 193.7 156.1 75.9 68.8 123.4 12.8 37.0
25 Bern, Switzerland 193.4 170.2 72.6 66.9 109.9 11.4 38.8
26 Edinburgh, United Kingdom 192.0 115.2 69.7 75.9 73.6 8.1 26.2
27 Christchurch, New Zealand 191.7 118.2 55.3 71.2 58.3 6.7 23.4
28 Villach, Austria 191.3 116.8 71.4 70.0 65.3 7.2 16.0
29 Hobart, Australia 191.2 140.1 65.9 64.2 73.8 8.7 37.1
30 Adelaide, Australia 191.1 125.7 66.9 72.4 74.4 10.1 38.2
31 Gold Coast, Australia 190.9 127.8 52.6 75.2 75.9 9.5 30.1
32 Perth, Australia 190.5 140.2 57.8 71.7 73.9 6.6 42.9
33 Canberra, Australia 190.0 137.2 71.5 69.0 77.7 9.9 39.3
34 Cork, Ireland 189.8 130.9 62.9 55.9 72.4 4.8 34.1
35 Brisbane, Australia 189.8 139.6 61.8 71.2 68.5 8.0 42.7
36 Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom 189.5 139.1 60.7 77.2 67.6 8.1 33.1
37 Graz, Austria 189.3 127.8 72.5 77.1 70.5 7.2 28.6
38 Basel, Switzerland 188.5 164.3 66.7 66.9 112.1 11.7 38.6
39 Glasgow, United Kingdom 187.2 121.4 55.1 78.4 68.1 5.3 28.3
40 Melbourne, Australia 186.8 134.4 55.7 72.1 77.3 7.6 42.0
41 Ottawa, Canada 186.2 136.9 69.1 68.4 62.5 6.5 32.6
42 Hamburg, Germany 186.2 127.1 59.3 74.3 71.0 11.1 30.5
43 Plzen, Czech Republic 186.2 103.8 69.8 76.3 51.1 12.0 21.6
44 Tallinn, Estonia 185.9 91.4 78.3 73.9 63.7 10.1 24.4
45 Tampa, FL, United States 185.4 139.9 55.2 66.2 69.4 4.1 38.0
46 Oklahoma City, OK, United States 185.0 136.5 49.3 63.7 70.0 2.8 32.1
47 Tucson, AZ, United States 185.0 154.0 45.6 61.3 64.4 3.7 33.1
48 Spokane, WA, United States 184.8 143.7 42.9 66.0 72.6 3.3 29.0
49 Orlando, FL, United States 184.8 145.0 50.5 61.6 72.0 3.1 37.8

These comparisons highlight the trade-offs between affordability and overall quality of life, helping surface which cities offer the strongest balance across both measures.

City Comparison

City Cost of Living Table Quality of Life Table
Cost of Living Rent Groceries Restaurant Price Local Purchasing Power Quality of Life Safety Health Care Property Price to Income Ratio Traffic Commute Time
Zurich, Switzerland 123.1 74.5 125.0 121.7 152.0 193.7 75.9 68.8 12.8 37.0
Basel, Switzerland 111.9 48.0 108.5 110.6 161.3 188.5 66.7 66.9 11.7 38.6
Geneva, Switzerland 111.3 64.3 107.3 114.5 151.2 194.3 70.5 69.3 13.1 32.6
Bern, Switzerland 108.7 44.5 105.7 108.3 168.4 193.4 72.6 66.9 11.4 38.8
Reykjavik, Iceland 98.3 48.7 107.6 104.1 109.3 194.8 75.4 69.6 7.8 20.5
Bergen, Norway 89.6 28.2 91.7 99.7 129.4 195.9 74.9 72.7 7.0 32.0
Stavanger, Norway 87.5 35.2 92.7 90.8 142.1 198.0 71.5 70.2 5.6 39.1
Trondheim, Norway 87.0 29.1 91.6 91.4 126.1 194.7 78.1 75.8 6.6 32.6
Copenhagen, Denmark 86.8 44.6 82.0 95.4 127.7 197.2 73.7 75.2 10.7 27.5
Amsterdam, Netherlands 81.4 54.5 74.2 85.8 119.9 196.4 70.0 75.4 9.9 22.8
Luxembourg, Luxembourg 80.6 52.1 76.9 90.4 136.9 201.6 71.5 72.4 10.6 27.8